Legal Opinion

International Business Machines Corp. v. Zaino

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 2002No. 00-1700PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPfeifer, J.

The question presented by this case is whether a taxpayer seeking a refund of an overpayment of franchise tax may seek that refund through a reassessment petition or whether the taxpayer must file an application for refund. We find that the law requires the filing of an application for refund.

Factual and Procedural Background

This appeal involves the 1993 Ohio franchise tax report of appellant, International Business Machines Corporation (“IBM”). On September 25, 1996, the commissioner and IBM entered into an agreement to extend the three-year deadline for the commissioner to assess, or the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. American Restaurant & Lunch Co. v. GlanderOhio Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Akron Standard Division of Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Lancaster Colony Corp. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1980

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Renacci v. Testa (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  2. UBS Financial Services, Inc. v. LevinOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Internatl. Business Machines Corp. v. ZainoOhio Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API