Legal Opinion · Dissent

Department of Transportation v. Coleman

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 2, 1997No. COA96-1233Published

1Dissent

Judge Greene

dissenting.

I do not agree that evidence of a property owner’s transactions and activities, prior to the date of a Chapter 136 condemnation, is admissible to determine the amount of just compensation. I would award the plaintiffs a new trial.

The damages in a Chapter 136 condemnation proceeding are to be determined as of the date of the taking. N.C.G.S. § 136-112 (1993). The taking occurs on the date Department of Transportation (DOT) files a civil action and declaration of taking. N.C.G.S. § 136-103 (1997).

Where only a part of a tract [of land] is taken, the measure of damages . .…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Templeton v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  2. City of Charlotte v. Charlotte Park & Recreation CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. NORTH CAROLINA STATE HIGHWAY COM'N v. HettigerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API