Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

City of Wichita v. Hill

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 26, 2000No. 81,491; 81,497; 81,509; 81,632Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partLeben, J.

I concur in parts I through III and V of Justice Abbott’s well-considered decision. As to the appeal involving William W. Russ, Jr., however, I would find, as did the trial judge and the Commissioner appointed by this court, that Russ could not properly be held on the municipal court’s contempt finding and pay-before-release jail order. Accordingly, I would affirm Judge Buchanan’s order that Russ be released from confinement under the contempt finding.

I

William Russ was fined a total of $199 in the Wichita Municipal Court for four separate traffic infractions and one other ordinance violation:…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Peyton v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. McNally v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Larry Lee Bledsue v. Gary L. Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
  4. In re MillingtonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880
  5. State v. ShannonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1995

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API