State v. Graham
Supreme Court of Arkansas
E««oa to Pulaski Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Rincso, Chief Justice,
delivered the following opinion in two cases, the two being precisely alike in every respect:
This is an indictment originally prosecuted in the City Court of Little Rock, against the defendant,for betting at a prohibited game commonly called faro; upon which the defendant was convicted on his own .confession of guilt, and a lino imposed upon him, and judgment therefor given in the City Court. To reverse which the defendant prosecuted a writ of error out of this court, whereby a transcript of the record, proceedings and judgment against him in the City Court, was brought…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Ex parte AnthonySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1844
- Hays v. Pope countySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1844
- State v. BostickSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
- Miller v. Heard & Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1845
- State v. JoshawaySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2010