Legal Opinion

State v. Graham

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 15, 1839PublishedCited by 5 opinions

E««oa to Pulaski Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Rincso, Chief Justice,

delivered the following opinion in two cases, the two being precisely alike in every respect:

This is an indictment originally prosecuted in the City Court of Little Rock, against the defendant,for betting at a prohibited game commonly called faro; upon which the defendant was convicted on his own .confession of guilt, and a lino imposed upon him, and judgment therefor given in the City Court. To reverse which the defendant prosecuted a writ of error out of this court, whereby a transcript of the record, proceedings and judgment against him in the City Court, was brought…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ex parte AnthonySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1844
  2. Hays v. Pope countySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1844
  3. State v. BostickSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  4. Miller v. Heard & Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1845
  5. State v. JoshawaySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API