Legal Opinion
Brown v. Eastman National Bank of Newkirk
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 20, 1955No. 36856PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JACKSON, Justice.
Ethel Brown, plaintiff in error (plaintiff below), appeals from an order and judgment of the trial court sustaining a general demurrer to her petition against the Eastman National Bank of Newkirk. The parties will be given their trial court designations.
Plaintiff alleged in her petition that she and her late husband, S. L. Brown, were the owners of a joint account in the defendant bank, the Eastman National Bank of Newkirk. That this account was owned by plaintiff and her husband as joint tenants, with right of survivorship, and not as tenants in common, and with either party…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Security State Bank of Comanche v. W. R. Johnston & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
- Esling v. City National Bank & Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1936
- First Nat. Bank of Durant v. School Dist. No. 4Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Young v. HembreeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Holt v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
3Cited by16 opinions
- First National Bank & Trust Co. of Vinita v. KisseeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Hendricks v. Grant County BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
- W. R. Grimshaw Co. v. First National Bank & Trust Co. of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
- Ingram v. LIBERTY NATL. BANK & TRUST CO. OF OKLAHOMA CITYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
- Downing v. First Bank in ClaremoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.