Legal Opinion

Mandel v. North Hudson Investment Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided September 27, 1933PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Brogan, Chief-Justice.

This is an appeal from an order made in the court of chancery upon the following state of facts.

The North Hudson Investment Company had for some time been indebted to the Union City National Bank for money advanced to it by the bank on its notes, which were secured by certain shares of stock of the Commonwealth Trust Company, a banking corporation of New Jersey.

In the course of time the Union City National Bank became insolvent and the comptroller of the currency of the United States appointed a receiver. The North Hudson…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gemmell v. Henry G. Davis & Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1892
  2. Union Trust Co. v. HasseltineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  3. Gaty v. HollidayMissouri Court of Appeals · 1879
  4. Hill v. . Newichawanick CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  5. Farquhar v. Canada-Atlantic & Plant Steamship Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Busch v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1944
  2. In re E. W. Hays & Co.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1935
  3. Busch v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1944
  4. Busch v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1944
  5. McGhie v. First and American National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API