Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Delta & Pine Land Co.

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1940No. 33674Published

1Dissent

Ethridge, J.,

delivered a dissenting opinion.

The general statement of the case is contained in Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company v. Delta & Pine Land Company, 169 Miss. 196, 150 So. 205, Miss., 188 So. 539, and in 292 U. S. 143, 54 S. Ct. 634, 78 L. Ed. 1178, 92 A. L. R. 928. The case as originally decided in these former hearings, except as reported in 188 So. 539, proceeded to hearing on a demurrer challenging a sufficiency of the appellant’s plea, setting up that the case was controlled by the Laws of Tennessee, and that under the laws of that state the giving of the notice within the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Hooper v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Home Insurance v. DickSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  3. Orient Insurance v. DaggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  4. Mutual Life Insurnace v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  5. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Delta & Pine Land Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API