Legal Opinion

Wolcott v. Patterson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1894PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to' Jackson. (Peck, J.) Submitted on briefs Jan_ nary 3, 1894. Decided May 18, 1894. Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

Plaintiff is an attorney at law, and recovered in the coprt below for professional services rendered to the defendant, who is a married woman. A portion of the services related to the separate estate of the defendant, who is shown in the record to have had considerable property in her own right. Included in the bill of particulars was a charge of $100 for retainer and services in a divorce suit brought by defendant against her husband. This proceeding was not carried through to a determination, but was discontinued by Mrs. Patterson before a decree.

Substantially the only question presented by…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Porter v. BriggsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1874
  2. Sprayberry v. MerkSupreme Court of Georgia · 1860
  3. Musick v. DodsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1882
  4. Ross v. RossMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Vickery v. ChaseIndiana Supreme Court · 1875

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bolthouse v. De SpelderMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  2. McCurdy v. DillonMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Meaher v. MitchellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1914
  4. Gilson v. City of CadillacMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Tyler v. WinderNebraska Supreme Court · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API