Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Director of Patuxent Institution

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided September 9, 1966No. App. No. 113PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

Petitioner, having filed a petition under the Post Conviction Procedure Act in the Criminal Court of Baltimore, was given a hearing before Judge Grady on 8 September 1965, at which time he was represented by counsel, appeared and testified. His petition was denied in a memorandum and order filed 27 October 1965.

This application, filed 14 December 1965, could be dismissed on the ground that applicant has not complied with Maryland Rule BK 46 in that he has failed to state any reasons why Judge Grady’s order should be reversed or modified. Ferrell v. Warden, 241 Md. 432, 216 A. 2d 740 (1966).…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bean v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  2. Cowans and Hayes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  3. Ferrell v. Warden of the Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
  4. Thornton v. Warden of Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
  5. Hamm v. Warden of Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Norris v. WardenCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1967
  2. State v. MerchantCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1970
  3. Creswell v. Director, Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1967
  4. Gullion v. WardenCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1968
  5. Anglin v. Director, Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1967

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API