Legal Opinion

In Re George's Estate

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1941No. 6204PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRATT, Justice.

In this case certain heirs of George A. George, deceased, who were excluded from benefits under his last will and testament, are protesting the admission of that will to probate, on three grounds, two of which were submitted to the jury: incapacity of George A. George to execute the will at the time it was executed; and undue influence exercised upon him by the son and daughter who were made the sole beneficiaries under the will. The protesting heirs include other sons and daughters of deceased. The case was tried to a jury, and a verdict was returned in favor of protestants;…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re Bryan's EstateUtah Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Goldsberry v. GreenUtah Supreme Court · 1938
  3. In Re McCoy's EstateUtah Supreme Court · 1937

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Swan's EstateUtah Supreme Court · 1956
  2. In RE LAVELLE'S ESTATE. IMMERCHAL v. First SEC. BankUtah Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Matter of Estate of RussellUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Hendee v. Walker Bank & Trust Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API