Legal Opinion

Daniel Bushar v. Albertsons LLC; Doe Security Company; Does I through XX, inclusive; and Roe Business Entities I through XX, inclusive

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided May 13, 2026No. 2:24-cv-00804Unknown

1Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 DANIEL BUSHAR, Plaintiff, CASE NO. 2:24-cv-00804-CDS-MDC 4 vs. ORDER DENYING IN PART AND 5 GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S ALBERTSONS LLC; DOE SECURITY MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANTS’ 6 COMPANY; DOES I through XX, inclusive EXPERTS (ECF No. 60) 7 and ROE BUSINESS ENTITIES I through XX, inclusive, 8 Defendants. 9 AND RELATED MATTERS 10 Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike Improperly Disclosed Rebuttal Experts (ECF No. 11 60)(“Motion”). By his Motion, plaintiff Daniel Bushar (“Plaintiff”) requests the Court strike 12 defendants’…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Yeti by Molly Ltd. v. Deckers Outdoor Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  2. United States v. Steven Elmer Luschen, United States of America v. Wayne Bernard KingCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
  3. Perez v. Las Vegas Medical CenterNevada Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Liberty Insurance Corporation v. Yvonne BrodeurCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
  5. Lindner v. Meadow Gold Dairies, Inc.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API