Legal Opinion

Gates v. Winslow

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided September 15, 1804PublishedCited by 2 opinions

This was an action of indebitatus assumpsit, for £100, money had and received by the defendant for the use of the plaintiffs. The defendant pleaded the general issue ; and non assumpsit infra sex annos.

1Opinion of the Court

The Court, (Dana, C. J., Strong, Sedgwick, and Thacher, justices,) without hearing the counsel for the defendants, were unanimous and clear that the plaintiffs could not support the action. They said the rule is (universally) that where the parties are equally innocent or equally guilty, melior est conditio possidentis. As no fraud or imposition is pretended to have been practised by the defendant, the Court will presume that the parties at the time of the transaction were on equal grounds. Any one who had voluntarily given away a sum of money might as well think of recovering it back as the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wallis v. WallisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1808

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Barron v. AshleySuperior Court of New Hampshire · 1827
  2. Adams v. BarryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1858

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API