Legal Opinion

Hughes v. Oregon Railway & Nav. Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1884PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from Multnomah County.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Waldo, C. J.:

By the statute of this state, a party for whose benefit a contract is made and who thereby becomes the real party in interest may sue upon it. It makes no difference that the contract is under seal. (McDowell v. Laer, 35 Wis., 171.)

It is next argued on the part of the respondent that the contract is joint, whereas the appellant has brought a separate action. The following citations will show the principle on which this point is to be decided: Washington, J., in Sawyer v. Steel, 4 Wash. C. C., 228, says: “The rule of law applicable to this subject is laid down in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McDowell v. LaevWisconsin Supreme Court · 1874
  2. United States v. NoyesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1822

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Parker v. JefferyOregon Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Webster v. FlemingIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Feldman v. McGuireOregon Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Washburn v. Interstate Investment Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Home v. SellingOregon Supreme Court · 1919

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API