Legal Opinion

Amaya v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 18, 2001No. 3D99-1336PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant was convicted of trafficking in cocaine and conspiring to traffic in cocaine. See §§ 893.135(l)(b), 893.135(5), Fla.Stats. (1997). Defendant argues that the state’s evidence was legally insufficient to establish possession. We disagree.

In the instant case the defendant and her companion had inspected the cocaine at issue and conducted negotiations with the Homestead Police detective acting under cover at the scene. Defendant’s companion, holding the drugs, put the cocaine down, reached into his pocket for his money, and then paid $7000 to the officer for the drugs. The two…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Garces v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  2. Lamanto v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  3. State v. NellumsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  4. Ortega v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Michael Anthony ConageCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
  2. Melphys Santana-Ozuna v. the State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API