Legal Opinion
In re Waterfront Park Act 250 Amendment (Alison Lockwood, Appellant)
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided April 15, 2016No. 2015-259PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.
¶ 1. This case requires us to apply Act 250 Rule 34(E), which establishes a framework for determining whether a party may seek to amend an Act 250 permit. Neighbor Alison Lockwood appeals from the Environmental Division’s award of summary judgment to the City of Burlington. The Environmental Division ruled that the City is entitled to seek an amendment to its Act 250 permit covering the Waterfront Park located on the shores of Lake Champlain. We affirm.
¶ 2. The material facts are not substantially in dispute. In 1990, the City obtained a land use permit for the Waterfront Park (the Park). The…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re Stowe Club HighlandsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996
- Noelia Monge v. Maya Magazines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- In re Application of Lathrop Limited Partnership I, II and IIISupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
- Gregory v. Beazer EastAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
- In Re Times and Seasons, LLCSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In re LaBerge NOVSupreme Court of Vermont · 2016
- Costco Wholesale Matters - Decision on the MeritsVermont Superior Court · 2024
- Green Mountain Dog Camp, LLC - Decision on MotionsVermont Superior Court · 2024
- Hawkins Bay Lane Minor SD - Decision on the MeritsVermont Superior Court · 2018
- Hinesburg Hannaford SD - Decision on MotionVermont Superior Court · 2019
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.