Legal Opinion

190 Riverside Drive L. L. C. v. Nosei

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided June 30, 2000PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Order dated May 14, 1999 reversed, with $10 costs, the petition is reinstated, and landlord’s cross motion for leave to conduct disclosure is granted.

The summary holdover proceeding seeks possession of apartment number 6C at premises located at 190 Riverside Drive, in Manhattan, based upon the stabilized tenant’s alleged nonprimary residence. The April 21, 1998 notice of nonrenewal underlying the proceeding was timely served upon the tenant and alleged sufficient facts to support landlord’s nonprimary residence claim, viz., that tenant owns and primarily resides in a…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cox v. J.D. Realty AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. MSG Pomp Corp. v. DoeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

4Cited by7 opinions

  1. Oxford Towers Co. v. LeitesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. Marine Terrace Associates v. KesoglidesAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2009
  3. Regency Towers LLC v. LandouCivil Court of the City of New York · 2006
  4. 307 W. 82nd St. Hous. Corp. v. ZachariasAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2018
  5. 3657 Realty Co., LLC v. JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API