Legal Opinion

Segreti, Exr. v. Frisk Et Ux.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 5, 1937No. Appeal, 174PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Schaffer,

This is a proceeding by scire facias to revive and continue the lien of a judgment. The issue is: Has a judgment, entered on a bond accompanying a mortgage, been discharged by reason of the fact that the mortgagee has become the owner of the fee? The court below held the judgment was discharged and entered judgment for defendants. Plaintiff appeals.

Spade and wife conveyed a property to Frisk and wife on March 26, 1929, and as part of the consideration accepted a bond and mortgage from the vendees for $2,500. The mortgage was subject to a prior one of $2,000.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Golder v. Bogash (Tr. Co. of Phila.)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Sparrow v. MowersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  3. Landis v. RobackerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  4. Sheehan B. L. Assn. v. ScanlonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  5. Lansford Building & Loan Ass'n v. SheerinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. First National Bank v. RockefellerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Stokes v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
  3. Arthurs Travel Center, Inc. v. AltenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Philadelphia Saving Fund Society v. SternSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  5. International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union v. Nazareth Mills Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Northampton County1954

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API