Edgerley v. Long Island Railroad
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Motion for reargument, and for leave to appeal to the court of appeals. Denied. For former opinion, see 60 N. Y. Supp. 1062.
1Opinion of the CourtHatch, J.
The motion for a reargument in this case raises no
new question not considered by this court when it decided the case. We did not then think that any good end would be subserved by putting down in detail each bit of evidence and circumstance showing the process'by which we reached the conclusion that the jury were authorized to find that the plaintiff was not guilty of contributory negligence. We so said in our former opinion. Authority is conclusive that such fact furnishes no ground of right to ask for a reargument. Fosdick v. Town of Hempstead, 126 N. Y. 651, 27 N. E. 382. It is also…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Heaney v. . Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Dolan v. . Delaware and Hudson Canal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Sciolina v. . Erie Preserving Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Wilber v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
- Fosdick v. . Town of HempsteadNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.