Legal Opinion

People v. Wilson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 11, 1996PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant has not preserved for appellate review his contention that the trial court committed reversible error by admitting evidence of an uncharged crime (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Gomez, 67 NY2d 843; People v Williams, 187 AD2d 547; People v Brito, 179 AD2d 666). In any event, the trial court did not err in allowing the victim to testify that he observed the defendant beating another man across the street immediately prior to the instant offense. The victim’s testimony established his ability to identify the defendant when he was subsequently approached by the defendant and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. SuitteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  2. People v. . MolineuxNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  3. People v. AllweissNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. People v. GomezNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. People v. BranchNew York Court of Appeals · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. GerstenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  2. People v. JamesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. People v. MobleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  4. People v. GousseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  5. People v. PettifordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API