South Carolina Second Injury Fund v. Young
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Goolsby, Judge:
The questions presented by the South Carolina Second Injury Fund in its appeal from the circuit court’s order *526affirming an award of death benefits to the respondent Charlotte Young are whether a niece of a deceased employee may qualify as a dependent under the South Carolina Workers’ Compensation Act and, if so, whether the finding by the South Carolina Workers’ Compensation Commission that Young was a niece wholly dependent on a deceased employee for her support is clearly erroneous in view of the reliable, probative, and substantial evidence on the whole record. We affirm.
I
The…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cokeley v. Robert Lee, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1941
- Day v. DAYSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1950
- Battalico v. Knickerbocker Fireproofing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
- Ellis v. EllisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
- South Carolina Second Injury Fund v. Lindberg Rabb & Frazier Pulpwood Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Adams v. Texfi IndustriesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998