Legal Opinion
United States v. Wishnatzki
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided May 13, 1935No. 322PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHASE, Circuit Judge.
The defendants were indicted for a violation of the Interstate Commerce Act (49 USCA § 10 (3), and were tried by court after a jury had been waived. See Patton v. United States, 281 U. S. 276, 50 S. Ct. 253, 74 L. Ed. 854, 70 A. L. R. 263. The government having elected to stand on the eleventh count in the indictment, the other counts were dismissed on its own motion. Defendant Sroge alone was convicted and has appealed.
Count 11 charged the defendants with knowingly and willfully filing a false claim against the Pennsylvania Railroad Company for damage to a carload of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Patton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MottleySupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Arizona Grocery Co. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Wiborg v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Clyatt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. National City Lines, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1948
- United States v. BennettCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Willcox v. GoessDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1936
- McDowell Associates, Inc. v. Pennsylvania RailroadDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1957
- United States v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1961
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.