Legal Opinion
Davenport v. Comstock Hills-Reno
Nevada Supreme Court
Decided May 17, 2002No. 37044Published
1Opinion of the Court
46 P.3d 62 (2002)
118 Nev. 389
Milsen J. DAVENPORT, Appellant,
v.
COMSTOCK HILLS-RENO, a California Limited Partnership d/b/a Comstock Hills; and Reitman Reno Properties Inc., a Nevada Corporation, Respondents.
No. 37044.
Supreme Court of Nevada.
May 17, 2002.
Goedert & Michaels, Reno, for appellant.
Thorndal Armstrong Delk Balkenbush & Eisinger, Katherine F. Bobier, Reno, for respondents.
BEFORE: SHEARING, ROSE and BECKER, JJ.
OPINION
ROSE, J.
As the primary issue of this appeal, we consider the breadth of Nevada's statutes of repose, which absolutely bar any action stemming from injuries caused by a…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Skinner v. AndersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
- Moody v. Manny's Auto RepairNevada Supreme Court · 1994
- Gunlock v. New Frontier Hotel Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 1962
- State v. WebsterNevada Supreme Court · 1972
- Cleghorn v. HessNevada Supreme Court · 1993
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.