Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Snelson

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided July 9, 1980No. 64980PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DALLY, Judge.

The petitioner, in this post-conviction proceeding, Art. 11.07, V.A.C.C.P., seeks to have set aside a judgment of conviction for aggravated robbery.

The petitioner asserts that the conviction is void in that the trial court did not have jurisdiction because there was a failure to allege in the indictment a necessary element of the offense. See Valdez v. State, 550 S.W.2d 88 (Tex.Cr.App.1977); Ex parte Cannon, 546 S.W.2d 266 (Tex.Cr.App.1976); Ex parte Garcia, 544 S.W.2d 432 (Tex.Cr. App.1976). It was not alleged that the petitioner had the “ . . . intent to obtain and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ex Parte CannonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
  2. Ex Parte GarciaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
  3. Ex Parte CountyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  4. Ex Parte ValdezCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. White v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
  2. Thomas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
  3. Luffred v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
  4. Morgan v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1983
  5. Martinez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API