Legal Opinion

Kip R. Ramsey, Dba Tiin-Ma Logging Co. Tiin-Ma Logging Co. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 11, 2002No. 01-35014PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TROTT, Circuit Judge.

OVERVIEW

The United States appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Kip R. Ramsey (“Ramsey”) awarding him a refund of federal heavy vehicle and diesel fuel taxes, penalties, and interest. The government argues that Ramsey’s prior federal lawsuit challenging a similar Washington state tax is not controlling, and that the district court erred by deferring to it. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. As in his prior suit, Ramsey claims that the 1855 Yaka-ma 1 Treaty exempts him from all taxes burdening his use of the public roads.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. McClanahan v. Arizona State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. White Mountain Apache Tribe v. BrackerSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Mescalero Apache Tribe v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Bryan v. Itasca CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Chickasaw Nation v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. King Mountain Tobacco Co. v. Robert McKennaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  2. Perkins v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2020
  3. King Mountain Tobacco Co. v. Alcohol & Tobacco Tax & Trade BureauDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2014
  4. United States v. King Mountain Tobacco CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  5. Barbara Berry, S.A. de C.V. v. Ken M. Spooner Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API