Kip R. Ramsey, Dba Tiin-Ma Logging Co. Tiin-Ma Logging Co. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TROTT, Circuit Judge.
OVERVIEW
The United States appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Kip R. Ramsey (“Ramsey”) awarding him a refund of federal heavy vehicle and diesel fuel taxes, penalties, and interest. The government argues that Ramsey’s prior federal lawsuit challenging a similar Washington state tax is not controlling, and that the district court erred by deferring to it. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. As in his prior suit, Ramsey claims that the 1855 Yaka-ma 1 Treaty exempts him from all taxes burdening his use of the public roads.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- McClanahan v. Arizona State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- White Mountain Apache Tribe v. BrackerSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Mescalero Apache Tribe v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Bryan v. Itasca CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Chickasaw Nation v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- King Mountain Tobacco Co. v. Robert McKennaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Perkins v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2020
- King Mountain Tobacco Co. v. Alcohol & Tobacco Tax & Trade BureauDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2014
- United States v. King Mountain Tobacco CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Barbara Berry, S.A. de C.V. v. Ken M. Spooner Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.