Legal Opinion

Rollins v. Beaumont-Port Arthur Bus Lines, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Louisiana

Decided March 5, 1950No. Civ. 2637PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAWKINS, Chief Judge.

This is an action in tort by a husband and wife, each claiming damages alleged to have been caused by a collision between an automobile driven by Mrs. Rollins with a bus of the defand'ant bus company.

Defendants have moved to strike an item of $5000 claimed by the husband for “loss by complainant of pleasant companionship of his wife * * * and loss of the services of his wife in performing her duties as housewife and mother of their children,” as not recoverable under Louisiana law, and if sustained, this would reduce his claim to the sum of $2100, less than the minimum…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Grier v. Tri-State Transit Co.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1940
  2. Bea v. RussoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1945
  3. Hollinquest v. Kansas City Southern Ry. Co.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1950

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Flowers v. US Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1980
  2. Nicholson v. BlanchetteCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  3. Gloria Muse, Wife of Russell Mills v. United States Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API