Legal Opinion

State v. Bailey

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 15, 1907PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The court did not err in refusing to charge the jury in the language of some of the defendant's requests to charge. There were six requests.* The first relates to the meaning and effect of the law forbidding a conviction unless the jury are satisfied that the accused is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Upon this point the court charged the jury fully, correctly, and in substantial compliance with the request.a The third request relates to the proof necessary to establish that deliberation and premeditation, in the perpetration of the offense, essential to bring a murder committed within the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. SchweitzerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1889
  2. State v. MarxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1905

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. PiskorskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  2. State v. HannaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
  3. Martyn v. DonlinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
  4. State v. ShawSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  5. People v. RongoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API