Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

People v. Nickel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 20, 2005Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Carpinello, J. (concurring in part and dissenting in part).

I dissent solely on the issue of sentence. In my view, both the original sentence imposed, an aggregate prison term of 54 years, as well as the majority’s modification thereof to an aggregate prison term of 32 years, are harsh and excessive. While I do not in any way minimize defendant’s abhorrent conduct toward ei*874ther victim, I do not think it warrants maximum, consecutive sentencing, even as modified by the majority (see People v Morin, 192 AD2d 791 [1993], lv denied 81 NY2d 1077 [1993]). Under equally offensive or even more…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. MorinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  2. People v. MunroeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  3. People v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  4. People v. PaigeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  5. People v. ParkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API