Legal Opinion

Jones v. Taylor

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 14, 1931No. Gen. No. 8,443PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Shurtleee

delivered the opinion of the court.

In this case we substantially adopt the statement made by defendant in error, to which no criticism has been presented to this court. The facts are somewhat complicated and for convenience the statement has been subdivided in an effort to make the facts clear.

The Bill and Cross-bill

When Jones filed his original bill for partition, the 100 acres subject to the mortgage was owned by himself and defendant in error Dr. Charles B. Taylor. Dr. Taylor filed his answer and cross-bill setting up facts to exonerate his 50 acres as…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Martin v. MartinIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Richardson v. HockenhullIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
  3. McKennan v. MickelberryIllinois Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Flagg v. GeltmacherIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Moffet v. FarwellIllinois Supreme Court · 1906

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Finley v. RowandAppellate Court of Illinois · 1939
  2. Schultz v. JohnsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API