Legal Opinion

Little v. Street Railway Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1889PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to superior court of Grand Eapids. (Burlingame, J.) Case. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

Plaintiff, while digging in a sewer-connecting ditch in a street in G-rand Bapids, was struck in the back by the projecting foot-board of an open passenger street-car, and badly injured. He sued defendant for damages, but the court below took the case from the jury on the ground of contributory negligence.

The testimony showed that a public sewer runs down the middle of South Division street, between two parallel tracks of defendant's railway. Plaintiff, with another person, was employed to dig a ditch from a lot owned by Mr. Barnes on the east side of the street to this sewer, for the purpose…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Chicago City Railway Co. v. FennimoreIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Rascher v. East Detroit & Grosse Pointe Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Quirk v. Rapid RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Grostick v. Detroit, Lansing & Northern RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Lau v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API