Legal Opinion

Franklin National Bank v. Lynch

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1961PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas P. Farley, J.

Petitioner, a judgment creditor of respondent Lynch, seeks an order pursuant to section 47-e of the Personal Property Law, vacating an assignment of wages made by Lynch in favor of respondent Roeper, on the ground that the same was never publicly filed as is required by sections 47 and 47-a of the Personal Property Law.

It appears that subsequent to the date of the execution of the subject assignment, petitioner had caused a wage garnishee order to be served on Lynch’s present employer, Suffolk Dairy, which has refused to honor the garnishee on the theory that the wage assignment is entitled…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Edison Electric Illuminating Co. v. Horace E. Frick Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
  2. Keve v. Columbia Kid Hair Curlers Manufacturing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
  3. Pratt v. LenahanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Szigyarto v. SzigyartoNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. City & Suburban Homes Co. v. John J. Reynolds, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1963
  3. Zig v. ZigNew York Family Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API