Gill v. Rich
California Court of Appeal
[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ALDRICH, J.
I
INTRODUCTION
Hundreds of physicians and surgeons formed an interindemnity arrangement pursuant to Insurance Code section 1280.7 to provide an alternative to medical malpractice insurance. In doing so, they funded a trust, Physicians Interindemnity Trust (PIT). Eventually, the trust was forced into receivership because it could not meet its obligations. Appellants are 47 members of PIT who refused to pay assessments levied on them by the receiver.
In the matter before us, the receiver obtained judgments against appellants for the unpaid assessments. Appellants appeal from…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Waller v. Truck Insurance Exchange, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
- Moradi-Shalal v. Fireman's Fund Ins. CompaniesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Saint Agnes Medical Center v. PacifiCare of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Donovan v. RRL Corp.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Neet v. HolmesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Nelson v. Pearson Ford Co.California Court of Appeal · 2010
- Citizens Business Bank v. GevorgianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- DuBeck v. California Physicians' ServiceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Monfort v. AdomaniDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2019