Legal Opinion

Fitzgerald v. Avidon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 21, 1995PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Helen Freedman, J.), entered April 10, 1995, which, inter alia, granted defendant’s motion for a physical examination of plaintiff, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Under the circumstances presented here, where plaintiff has never been physically examined, and where the case remains on the trial calendar for an assessment of damages, it was a proper exercise of discretion on the part of the court to have directed a physical examination of plaintiff, even though more than 20 days had elapsed from the filing of plaintiff’s note of issue and certificate…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dominguez v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Blamer v. SinghAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. Glover v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API