Legal Opinion

Hook v. Springfield

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 2002No. 2001-0519Published

1Opinion of the Court

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 94 Ohio St.3d 1251.] HOOK; GENTIS, EXR., APPELLANT, v. CITY OF SPRINGFIELD ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as Hook v. Springfield,

2002-Ohio-1490.] Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed. (No. 01-519—Submitted February 26, 2002—Decided April 3, 2002.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Clark County, No. 2000CA71. __________________ {¶ 1} The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed. MOYER, C.J., F.E. SWEENEY, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. DOUGLAS, J., dissents. RESNICK and PFEIFER, JJ., dissent.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Liposchak v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State ex rel. Liposchak v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State ex rel. Johnston v. Ohio Bureau of Workers' CompensationOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  4. State ex rel. Johnston v. Ohio Bur. of Workers' Comp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API