Dye v. Garrett & Latimer
Supreme Court of Georgia
Promissory "Notes. Contracts. Practice in Superior Court. Judgments. Constitutional Law. Before Judge Roney. Richmond Superior Court. October Term, 1886. Reported in the decision.
1Opinion of the Court
Blandford, Justice.
Garrett & Latimer brought their action against Dye upon three promissory notes. This action was filed and commenced in January, 1886. These three notes bore equal date; the first was due on the 1st of January, 1886; the second, the 1st of January, 1887 ; and the third, the 1st of January, 1888. The declaration, besides giving copies of the notes, alleged that they were all due by virtue of the covenants in a certain bond for titles set out and annexed to the declaration, to the effect that if the first note was not paid at maturity, then the other two notes should become…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Thomas v. American Freehold Land & Mortgage Co. of London, Ltd.U.S. Circuit Court for the Southern District of Georgia · 1891
- Jones v. North American Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
- Apperson v. Mutual Fertilizer Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1918
- HARTSFIELD COMPANY NO. 3, INC. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Hamby v. HambyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.