Legal Opinion

Maryland Casualty Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 29, 1972No. Q-51PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge.

This interlocutory appeal is from an order denying appellants’ motions to dismiss the amended third party complaint and to quash service of process.

The 'appellants are Theodore H. Collins and Ronald W. Tydings, individually and as co-administrators of the estate of Edward L. Jones, and their fiduciary bondholder, Maryland Casualty Company. The only issue with which we are now confronted is whether or not said appellants, who are not residents of Florida, are subject to service of process under § 48.161(2) of the Florida Statutes, F.S.A. This question can be disposed of by…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McCarthy v. Little River Bank and Trust CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
  2. Marion County Hospital District v. NamerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Waxoyl Ag v. Taylor, Brion, BukerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  2. McLean v. Church of Scientology of Cal.District Court, M.D. Florida · 1982
  3. International Graphics, Inc. v. MTA-Travel Ways, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1976
  4. MISCHA HERFF v. WESTON PROPERTIES, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API