Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Dato v. Himes

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided October 29, 1938PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Per curiam

Upon petition filed this court issued a Rule nisi to the resident Judge of the Criminal Court of Record for Hillsborough County to show cause why a Writ of Prohibition should not, on the ground of second jeopardy be issued to restrain the trial of the relators' on an information charging them with the commission of a felony. The respondent Judge, by the Attorney-General and the County Solicitor, filed a demurrer and also an answer or return to the Petition for Prohibition. Relators moved for a writ of Prohibition absolute notwithstanding the demurrer and return.

It is made to appear that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Thompson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Fairchild v. HughesSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. Allen v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1906
  4. Sherlock v. MayorSupreme Court of Florida · 1879
  5. Frederick, as Co. Solicitor v. Rowe as JudgeSupreme Court of Florida · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State v. GraysonSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
  2. Adkins v. SmithSupreme Court of Florida · 1967
  3. Application of WilliamsArizona Supreme Court · 1958
  4. State Ex Rel. Manning v. HimesSupreme Court of Florida · 1943
  5. State Ex Rel. Alcala v. GraysonSupreme Court of Florida · 1945

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API