Legal Opinion
People v. Prisco
New York County Courts
Decided May 21, 1962PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHyman Korn, J.
The defendants move for the vacatur of the search warrant issued on the 2nd day of February, 1962 by Hon. Samuel J. Ohringer, a City Magistrate, for the suppression of the evidence seized under such warrant, and for the return of the evidence so seized which predicates an indictment alleging violations of section 1372 of the Penal Law (contriving, drawing, and assisting in a lottery) and section 974-a of the Penal Law (operating a policy business).
The challenge to the legality of the indictment against the defendants herein is grounded on claims that (a) there was insufficient2 ‘ probable…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Keiningham v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960
- Hofferman v. SimmonsNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
- People Ex Rel. Robert Simpson Co. v. KempnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
- Atlanta Enterprises, Inc. v. CrawfordDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1927
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. Di PolitoRochester City Court · 1969
- People v. WatsonCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1963
- People v. KatzCity of New York Municipal Court · 1980
- Informal Opinion No., New York Attorney General Reports1985