Legal Opinion
Fiorile v. Goldman
New York County Courts
Decided July 26, 1960PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJames D. Hopkins, J.
The plaintiff moves for judgment on the pleadings, and the facts are virtually conceded. The plaintiff is a member of the police force of the City of Yonkers, having been appointed on October 1, 1955. At the time of his appointment he was a member of the 101st Signal Battalion of the National Guard, and has continued to be a member of the National Guard. During the period of his service on the police force he was ordered to active duty in accordance with the requirements of the National Guard, and he carried out his duty, amounting to two weeks’ time for each of the years between 1956 and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Quayle v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Harman v. Board of Educ. of City of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1949
- Hoyt v. County of BroomeNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
- Matter of Williams v. WalshNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
- Parker v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1945
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Board of Education v. LicataAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Opn. No., New York Attorney General Reports1977