ETU, Inc. v. Environmental Quality Commission
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtOrtega, J.
Respondents ETU, Inc. (ETU), and Ed Niemi Oil Company, Inc. (Niemi), 1 seek judicial review of final orders issued by the Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ). 2 Respondents contend that DEQ erred by serving them, but not their attorney, with a notice of violation and subsequent default final orders and then by denying respondents’ late request for hearing. Because we conclude that respondents did not timely seek judicial review of the default final orders and that we therefore lack jurisdiction, we dismiss the petition for judicial review as to those orders. As to DEQ’s order denying…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Don't Waste Oregon Committee v. Energy Facility Siting CouncilOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- Miller v. Water Wonderland Improvement DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1998
- Teel Irrigation District v. Water Resources DepartmentOregon Supreme Court · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- ETU, Inc. v. Environmental Quality CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 2007