Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Bridges v. Parrish

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 21, 2012No. COA12-181Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partGeer, Judge

I concur with the majority opinion except for the claim for negligent storage of a firearm, which I believe may also encompass the claim for negligent entrustment of a firearm. Our courts have not yet had an opportunity to address such a negligence claim.

I am persuaded by the reasoning in the following cases from other jurisdictions recognizing a claim for negligent storage of a firearm under circumstances similar to those alleged in the complaint. See Irons v. Cole, 46 Conn. Supp. 1, 8-9, 734 A.2d 1052, 1056 (1998) (upholding verdict against parents for negligent storage and maintenance of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jupin v. KaskMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
  2. Estate of Heck Ex Rel. Heck v. StofferIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Foster v. ArthurDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  4. Edmunds v. CowanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API