Legal Opinion

Noumoff v. Rotkvich

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 20, 1967No. Gen. 51,416PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Drucker

Plaintiff, Sylvia Noumoff, appeals from the judgment entered for the defendant and from the denial of her motion for a new trial after a jury verdict in favor of the defendant, Dorothy Rotkvich. This was an action brought by the plaintiff to recover damages under the Dram Shop Act (Ill Rev Stats 1957, c 43, § 135) 1 against Nicholas Rotkvich, Dorothy Rotkvich, Michael D. McFarland and Loretta McFarland as defendants. The latter two defendants were covenanted out and are not now parties to this action. Nicholas Rotkvich died during the pendency of this action and the cause proceeded to trial…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Diamond Glue Co. v. WietzychowskiIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Stanton v. Pennsylvania RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1961
  3. State v. EasterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Dexheimer v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  2. Rigor v. Howard Liquors, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1973
  3. Lawson v. Belt Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  4. People v. WilsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  5. Wilkinson v. MullenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API