Legal Opinion

Briggs v. Norris

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 1887PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Kent. (Montgomery, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

OampbjülIí, O. J.

Plaintiff sued and recovered judgment below upon the guaranty of defendant on a note of Jacob Eerris. The note was for $250, payable in 60 days, dated June 25, 1884, and secured by chattel mortgage. The guaranty was in these words;

*326“ I guarantee the collection of the within note and mortgage as one contract; will pay deficiency on mortgage sale.”

Some payments were made, and there was some dispute about whether extensions had not been granted Mr. Ferris which should discharge the guarantor. One of these payments was made through the guarantor, who drew up .a receipt signed by…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Peoples Wayne County Bank v. LonyoMichigan Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API