Legal Opinion
Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians v. Michigan
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided September 15, 1993No. 92-1683PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUHRHEINRICH, Circuit Judge.
In this interlocutory appeal brought under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA), 25 U.S.C. §§ 2701-2721, plaintiffs Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians, Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa and Chippewa Indians, Keweenaw Bay Indian Community, Hannahville Indian Community, Bay Mills Indian Community, and Lac Vieux Desert Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians challenge the district court’s order dismissing their suit against defendant the State of Michigan (Michigan) under the Eleventh Amendment. For the following reasons, we DISMISS this appeal for lack of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Puerto Rico Aqueduct and Sewer Authority v. Metcalf & Eddy, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. RisjordSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians v. EnglerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Michigan Bell Telephone Co. v. Climax Telephone Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Children's Healthcare is a Legal Duty, Inc. v. DetersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Thomas Burrell v. Tennessee Department of Human Services, Tipton County Board of Education, Sharon Sanders, Lani Simmons BrightCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
- Sault Ste. Marie Tribe Of Chippewa Indians v. John M. EnglerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.