Schill v. Langdon Farmers Union Oil Co.
North Dakota Supreme Court
1DissentMeschke, Justice
I respectfully dissent. The majority opinion consciously confuses the distinction between findings of fact and conclusions of law.
Mary Schill sought summary judgment, showing that S & S Farms had voluntarily dissolved and that the Oil Company “maintains a policy of immediate redemption of the capital credits upon the death of a natural patron.” Citing In Re Great Plains Royalty Corporation, 471 F.2d 1261 (8th Cir.1973), Mary Schill argued that the Oil Company’s “stock retirement policy illegally discriminate[d] against [her] and violate[d] both statute as well as the contractual relationship…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Golden v. Oahe Enterprises, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
- Brown v. North Dakota State UniversityNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Evanenko v. Farmers Union ElevatorNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1971
- Lillethun v. Tri-County Electric Cooperative, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1967
- Remillong v. SchneiderNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.