Legal Opinion · Dissent

Schill v. Langdon Farmers Union Oil Co.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1989No. Civ. 880174Published

1DissentMeschke, Justice

I respectfully dissent. The majority opinion consciously confuses the distinction between findings of fact and conclusions of law.

Mary Schill sought summary judgment, showing that S & S Farms had voluntarily dissolved and that the Oil Company “maintains a policy of immediate redemption of the capital credits upon the death of a natural patron.” Citing In Re Great Plains Royalty Corporation, 471 F.2d 1261 (8th Cir.1973), Mary Schill argued that the Oil Company’s “stock retirement policy illegally discriminate[d] against [her] and violate[d] both statute as well as the contractual relationship…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Golden v. Oahe Enterprises, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Brown v. North Dakota State UniversityNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Evanenko v. Farmers Union ElevatorNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Lillethun v. Tri-County Electric Cooperative, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Remillong v. SchneiderNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API