Legal Opinion

Kenworthy v. Hirst

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania

Decided July 13, 1903No. 3Published

At Daw. On rules for judgment for insufficient affidavit of defense.

1Opinion of the Court

DALLAS, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiffs’ statement of claim is the equivalent of the common count for goods sold and delivered, with a bill of particulars, annexed, which is alleged to be a copy of the plaintiffs’ book of original entry. The first item of this bill is: “Jan. 1, 1897. To balance due plaintiffs upon agreed settlement of account, $40,260.09.” I think a mistake must have occurred in presenting this as an entry contained in a book of account, for it is improbable that the word “plaintiffs” would be employed by a bookkeeper, especially at a time when, so far as appears, there was no…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hoopes v. Northern Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API