Legal Opinion
LaBranche v. Apple Inc.
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Decided March 3, 2025No. 2:24-cv-00234Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA JAMIE LABRANCHE CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 24-234 APPLE, INC., ET AL. SECTION “O” ORDER AND REASONS Before the Court is pro se Plaintiff Jamie LaBranche’s motion1 to recuse Magistrate Judge Currault and me. Liberally construed, see Collins v. Dall. Leadership Found.,
77 F.4th 327, 330
(5th Cir. 2023), LaBranche’s pro se motion asserts that recusal is required under
28 U.S.C. §§ 455(a), (b)(1), and (b)(3). This litigation arises from Jamie LaBranche’s allegation that Defendant Apple, Inc., and its CEO, Defendant Tim Cook, “fail[ed] to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. Mmr Corp. And James B. RutlandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- Collins v. Dallas Ldrshp FdnCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2023
- Luis Tejero v. Portfolio Recovery Assoc, LLCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. QuintanillaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2024
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.