Legal Opinion

Joseloff v. Berg

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided July 1, 1936No. File #52770Published

1Opinion of the CourtCornell, J.

The reasons of demurrer filed, present the question whether the mortgage note in suit is negotiable.

Plaintiff’s contention that it is nonnegotiable is based on the fact that it contains two clauses, which, he maintains make it so. These are the following:

“(1) the makers hereof .... agree that .... if any payment of taxes, or of any assessments, or of in' sura nee premiums on said premises are not paid within a period of 30 days after any of the same become due and payable, then and thereupon, the entire balance of this note shall become immediately due and payable at the option of the holder…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mechanics Bank v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
  2. Mazurkiewicz v. DowholonekSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
  3. Piascyk v. MalonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  4. Schumacher v. MillerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API