Kramer v. Danalis
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
There was no basis for the court to consider summary judgment on plaintiffs unpleaded claim for enforcement of the operating agreement. Summary judgment may be awarded on an unpleaded cause of action only if the proof supports such a claim and if the opposing party has not been misled to its prejudice (Weinstock v Handler, 254 AD2d 165, 166 [1998]).
Here, the amended complaint does not even make reference to the operating agreement, and in fact seeks to have all the agreements declared void, which is contradictory to the relief actually granted. Furthermore, even if it were appropriate to…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Weinstock v. HandlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
3Cited by6 opinions
- Diamond Roofing Co., Inc. v. PCL Props., LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Mendoza v. Manila Bar & Restaurant Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Roddy v. Nederlander Producing Co. of America, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Case transferred to the Southern District of New YorkJohn A. Mansour v. Morgan StanleyDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2025
- Fofana v. 41 West 34th Street, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.