Legal Opinion
United States Banknote Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided May 31, 1990No. 207 C.D. 1990PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NARICK, Senior Judge.
United States Banknote Company (Employer) appeals from a decision of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) reversing a referee’s decision that Diane M. Reitz (Claimant) was ineligible for benefits because she voluntarily abandoned her position. We affirm.
The facts as found by the Board are as follows. Claimant was employed at a rate of $7.74 per hour as an inspector for Employer from September 1987 to August 7, 1989. She began experiencing problems with her co-workers in March of 1988. In addition to subjecting her to harassing and insulting remarks, they…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Taylor v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- St. Barnabas, Inc. v. UN. COMP. BD. OF REV.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
3Cited by35 opinions
- Morgan v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Cambria Cnty. Transit Auth. v. Unemployment Comp. Bd. of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- Mutual Pharmaceutical Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Platz v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- A. Briggs v. UCBRCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.