United States ex rel. Zdunic v. Uhl
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Per curiam 1
Order affirmed in open court.
On Petition for Rehearing.
2Per curiam 2
The relator asks for a rehearing on the ground that the order dismissing his writ of habeas corpus was affirmed after an oral argument in which his counsel had not sufficient opportunity fully to present his points and without complete examination of the printed briefs. In order to afford every consideration to the relator and his counsel and in spite of our conclusion at the termination of the oral argument, we have examined the briefs and remain satisfied that there was no merit in the appeal and that the relator is properly held by the…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. Sing Tuck or King Do & Thirty-OneSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- United States ex rel. Ross v. WallisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
- Ex Parte CatanzaroCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1943
- Delany v. MoraitisCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1943
- Moraitis v. DelanyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1942
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by8 opinions
- Florentine v. Landon, District Director of Immigration and NaturalizationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
- United States Ex Rel. Russo v. Thompson, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
- In re ArgyrosDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1965
- Ng Yip Lee v. BarberCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
- Ex Parte SentnerDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1950
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.